WEB Georgia Election Hearing Updates: Court Adjourns with No Decision in Meadows Case
Attorney-Client Privilege Arguments Heard
In a closely watched court hearing, a federal judge in Georgia has yet to rule on former Trump aide Mark Meadows's request to have a lawsuit against him moved to federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Meadows pressured Georgia officials to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
Meadows Testifies, Invokes Privilege
During the all-day hearing, Meadows took the stand and invoked attorney-client privilege in response to several questions regarding his communications with Trump and his campaign team. Meadows, who served as Trump's final White House chief of staff, is one of 19 defendants in the case alleging that Trump unlawfully interfered in the 2020 election.
Judge to Rule on Privilege, Venue
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg did not make a decision on Meadows's motion to dismiss the case, but indicated she will rule on the attorney-client privilege issue and the venue dispute shortly. The hearing was adjourned without a set date for a decision.
Trump's Interference Alleged
The lawsuit alleges that Meadows, along with Trump and other defendants, engaged in a "multi-state conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election." The plaintiffs claim that Meadows's actions, including phone calls to Georgia officials, were part of a coordinated effort to pressure state officials to change the election results in Trump's favor.
Outcome Uncertain
The outcome of the lawsuit could have significant implications for the investigation into Trump's actions leading up to and following the 2020 election. If the case remains in state court, Meadows and the other defendants may face a higher likelihood of conviction.
Comments